Click
here to return to RHB Home
Requiem for
a species: why we resist the truth about climate change”
by
Clive Hamilton - Allen
& Unwin 2010
In
the first paragraph of
the
preface Clive Hamilton
indicates the primary message of this book:
“Sometimes
facing up to the truth
is just too hard. When the facts are distressing it is easier to
reframe or
ignore them. Around the world only a few have truly faced up to the
facts about
global warming. Apart from the climate ‘sceptics’, most
people do not
disbelieve what the climate scientists have been saying about the
calamities
expected to befall us. But accepting intellectually is not the same as
accepting emotionally the possibility that the world as we know it is
heading
for a horrible end. It’s the same with our own deaths: we all
‘accept’ that we
will die, but it is only when death is imminent that we confront the
true
meaning of our mortality.”
In
summary, this book
presents
the evidence showing how the
human species now has the capacity to fundamentally alter the biosphere
of the
earth. Having presented and examined that evidence, Hamilton goes on to
consider the economic, social and political attitudes in human
recognition or
denial of human impact on the biosphere.
In
the first chapter he
outlines
basic climate science and
says that we cannot escape the evidence before us. He points out that
many
humans have not accepted the threats posed by global warming, but in
many cases
have tried to attack the scientists who have given the message. For at
least 3
million years the earth’s atmosphere has been beautifully
balanced at around
300 parts per million (ppm) of CO2.
However, since the start of the industrial age the level has reached
approximately 400 ppm and it is still rising. Already global
temperatures are
rising and many effects have been experienced.
Most climate scientists have shown the considerable disruption
in the
Earth’s environment to be expected if CO2
rises above 450 ppm.
Because of the long duration of CO2
concentration in the upper atmosphere, it appears highly
likely that this level will be approached, no matter what remedial
action is
now taken. So climate changes, already experienced are set to continue.
A
large part of the book is
concerned with the way in which
many people have challenged the idea of any limits to economic growth.
With
several countries announcing that they will not introduce any measures
to
reduce greenhouse gas emissions if these adversely affect the economy
of their particular
country. Hamilton considers two major reports by well-known economists
who
reviewed an economic/political approach to CO2
control, the report by Nicholas Stern in UK and that by
Ross Garner in Australia. He points out that both of these reports did
not seem
to fully appreciate the nature of global warming - that it does not
respond in
a linear fashion to CO2
growth, nor that growth at a particular time can be reversed later,
with little
adverse effect. Both the reports suggest that it would be possible to
allow CO2 concentration to rise to
550
ppm and then be lowered. A US economist, William Naudhaus, goes further
in denouncing
those two reports and, with a very clinical economic analysis, suggests
that we
should do nothing, but simply allow CO2
emissions to grow and accept disasters, storms and diseases
as the world temperature rises. His analysis shows this would have the
least
damage on GDP. A chilling approach. As
Hamilton points out, environmental changes, with loss of crops, storms
and
disease will create jobs, such as: disaster recovery, rebuilding,
treatment of
ill and injured people; activities which increase GDP and thus grow the
economy. Is this what we want?
Hamilton considers
the many forms of denial
that
humans
invoke when they are faced with evidence or values that they do not
want to
accept. He quotes the situation that Leo Festinger experienced and
wrote about
in his 1956 book “When Prophecy Fails”. In the early 1950s,
a woman known as
Marianne Keech (whose real name was Dorothy Martin) claimed an
extraterritorial
communication had told her that a global flood would happen at midnight
on 21st
of December 1954. To survive, people should sell up their possessions
and
gather at her house on that day to be rescued by a spaceship from
another
planet. Many people did just that and of course there was much distress
when
nothing happened at the appointed time. However the group was saved
from deep
despondency when they were told, around 4 AM that morning, of a new
message
saying that God had stopped the flood, because the group had spread so
much
light. Believing that their devotion had not been in vain, the group
continued
for some years to spread their message throughout the world.
Festinger,
then a young
psychologist, had joined the group
and studied it before and after the predicted doomsday. It was the
response of
the group, to continue their belief in spite of contrary evidence, that
stimulated him to develop the theory of cognitive
dissonance; now well accepted and studied by many psychologists.
Cognitive dissonance
has been characterised as the art of lying to yourself. Mental
stress or discomfort arises when
holding two contradictory beliefs or values at the same time. Humans
always
strive for internal consistency, but there are many situations leading
to
cognitive dissonance.
In
the book Hamilton says:
“Festinger’s
analysis helps us
understand the phenomenon of climate change ‘scepticism’
or, more accurately,
denial. If humans are rational creatures, we would expect that as the
scientific evidence confirming human-induced global warming has become
overwhelming, the deniers would adjust their beliefs to accommodate the
facts.
Yet they have become more vehement in their attacks on climate
scientists,
environmentalists and anyone who accepts the evidence for global
warming. They
have ways of explaining away the facts: scientists have distorted their
results
to obtain more research funding; other scientists in possession of the
truth
have been silenced; governments have caved in to pressure from
environmentalists
who are hell-bent on destroying the free market system.”
Hamilton
suggests that the
neo-conservatives were in a
quandary when the science they had embraced as a major driver to
economic
growth, also showed that there is a scientific constraint to that
growth. The
matter came to a head in 1992 with the Rio Earth Summit considering
global
warming. President George Bush Snr.
saw the political dangers and instructed the US delegation to water
down, or
block, most diplomatic initiatives.
Many
large organisations,
including of course those
depending on fossil fuels, decided that the best way to counter any
attempts at
reducing CO2 emissions
was to spread doubt about the science. To a large extent this approach
has
worked very effectively so that the general public in many parts of the
world
is now very confused and uncertain about climate science, in spite of
increasing evidence. In this situation, as Sigmund Freud and his
daughter Anna
identified many years ago, we use defence mechanisms to shield
ourselves from
distressing features of the world. Thus we distract ourselves whenever
the
topic of global warming comes up – an everyday form of denial. It
is similar to
the approach that most people take when the question of their own death
is
considered.
The
book has a long chapter
on
how humans have, by-and-large,
attempted to disconnect themselves and their cities from nature, even
though
nature periodically demonstrates its massive power with earthquakes,
volcanoes,
tsunamis and cyclonic storms.
Hamilton
considers some of
the
technological systems that
can be adopted to reduce CO2
emission and to mitigate the effects of climate change. He goes through
the technology
and benefits of alternative energy sources, including: hydroelectric,
solar,
wind, tidal, wave and geothermal. He discusses nuclear energy sources
and
outlines some of the remaining risks. Large scale geoengineering
solutions are
considered, but he points out that most of these are still at the
embryonic
stage and have some major improperly understood risks. He mentions
schemes such
as seeding the ocean with iron filings to encourage tiny marine plants
–
phytoplankton – to draw carbon dioxide out of the atmosphere,
even though there
is very little understanding of what this will do to the oceans.
Another scheme
that has been suggested is to shade the whole globe by injecting
materials such
as sulphate aerosols into the upper atmosphere. As well as possibly
reducing
the temperature of the earth, this will certainly have side-effects
such as the
change in the colour of the sky to a grey or very pale blue and
possibly
influence the growth of crops. One scary aspect of injecting an aerosol
is that
it could be performed by any country and it would then influence
everybody on
earth for years to come.
There
is a chapter outlining
some
of the conclusions reached
by an eminent group of climate scientists who met for a conference in
2009,
specifically considering the situation if the world temperature rose by
4°. The
conclusions found at the conference are certainly not encouraging.
The
final chapter
“Reconstructing a future”, is Hamilton’s
concept of how to live when one firmly believes in the science of
anthropomorphic
(human induced) climate change and its adverse effects on life in the
future.
In the preface he says this was the most difficult chapter to write
because it
is the situation that he personally believes he must live with. Indeed
anybody
who accepts the science finds it ‘an unpleasant truth’, as
Al Gore pointed out.
In Hamilton’s view we have reached this unpleasant situation
because of a failure
in national and international governance. Reporting by spin doctors has
replaced honest communication. As the years go by and the situation
becomes
more critical, people will have to accept the fact that the future will
be
vastly different to the past. It had been largely accepted in almost
all
nations that there would be endless progress and a stable future with
our
capacity to control the natural world. Now we must accept that this is
not the
case and we will have to plan for a different world with increasing
problems
and the need for constant adaption to situations that humans have never
previously known. Psychologists and psychiatrists are already treating
people
facing depression from the realisation of climate change and its
implications.
In many cases they are suggesting that their clients should ‘be
optimistic
about the future’. Hamilton suggests this indicates a failure by
the
psychologists and psychiatrists to fully grasp the significance of the
situation.
His
final message is that
while
we may despair of the situation, we need to move
forward and accept reality. Then we must move into
the phase of action to live in the
future as it is likely to be. He suggests these stages (despair,
acceptance,
action) are the essential human approaches to any major loss, such as a
financial crash, a divorce or the death of the partner.
While
this might be
considered a
rather depressing book, it
offers a realistic picture of global science and the nature of society,
economics and politics driven by the psychology of human beings. We
face a
challenging future and, although our species is one of the
‘newest kids on the
block’ in relation to the life of this planet, we have developed
rapidly and
have faced many challenges. If we can overcome our selfish and
short-term
emotions, we should be able to develop a satisfactory long-lasting
lifestyle
for all peoples on this fragile spaceship. The book certainly triggers
some
deep thought about why people do what they do.
It
is appropriate to note
that in
the four years since the
book was published several reports have shown significant increases in
global
temperature and upper atmosphere CO2.
It is pleasing to note that several of the large-population countries
and
regions, such as China, Europe and USA, are starting to recognise the
dangers
facing the world and steps, albeit slowly, are being taken to limit
greenhouse
gas emissions. Some smaller nations, such as Australia and Canada,
still follow
policies for immediate political and economic gain whilst ignoring
long-term
influences on the environment and indeed on the economy.
RH
Brown
11
September
2014
(13th
anniversary of anniversary of that significant US catastrophe that
changed the
world)